thenonist.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the thenonist.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host thenonist.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is River City Internet Group .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

annex | menu about (i) contact (i) search (i) annex (i) special projects (i) gallery (i) downloads (i) shop (i) archives (i) links (i) feeds: rss2 | atom (i) this post is not about art when i tell you that the arrangement of sweetly colored textural shapes above is not art i sincerely hope you believe it. admittedly, you have little reason to. you’ve been here before. you’ve seen that week after week i populate this space with images that are in fact art, or could, without too great a leap of imagination, be considered as such. high art, low art, unexpected art, unintentional art; categorical labels and their attendant quotation marks, though generally eschewed, abound here for those who’d choose to employ them. this post though, is different. truly. so when i assure you that the image above, and those to follow below are not art, have nothing whatsoever to do with art, and that when looking at them you probably ought to cringe and scowl, your nose ought to wrinkle, and you should turn away feeling vaguely disgusted, know that i mean it. view full text this image is not art. no matter that it sits there, displaying a certain textural quality. no matter that you can almost feel it on your fingers. no matter that your eyes glide over its surfaces and dip into its recesses. no matter that, just behind your eyes, your mind does its tricks of correlation and interpretation. don’t be fooled. there is a shape on display here. no doubt about that. it’s a voluminous shape seeming to take up space. there is a complexity to it and a certain asymmetrical balance. you might become intrigued by this shape. you might even find yourself creating a sort of mental model of the shape, spinning it around in your mind, and contemplating it’s aesthetic qualities. but none of that makes this thing art. here are some colors. a controlled and not altogether inharmonious palette of colors in fact. colors bear associations and even emotional content evidently, so the colors here could conceivably not only send you off on a tangent of associative thought but also make you feel something. don’t, however, confuse this experience with that of viewing a piece of art. the thing above exhibits absolutely no obvious utility or function. but there it is, existing. surely there must be a reason. you know as much. maybe the reason is obscure and abstract, or maybe the reason is simply obscure to you, unfamiliar as you are with items like this one. but don’t think for a second that the probable necessity of some explanatory paragraphs to make that reason clear confers some artistic gravitas on this thing. this thing is not art. again, you might ask yourself, what is this? what is it for? what does it mean? looking at it all sorts of inferences come to mind, surfacing, playing out, and being replaced in turn. there is a free-association of language, with words just tumbling about willy-nilly, almost like poetry- humble mesoamerican bruise papoose, subcutaneous, atrophied and oxidized, slouching toward enanthem but lost to the lava flow . the texture, colors, and shapes all suggest corollaries and possibilities. there is something phallic about it obviously. also something vaguely anthropomorphic. something morbid perhaps, or fetid. something grotesque but also compelling… as your mind applies all its algorithms just remember this, whatever it is, it isn’t art. of that you can be sure. - being that i am the one who put these items on display i can hardly pretend that i don’t know what they actually are and where they come from. some of you most likely want to know after having read 6 paragraphs which lead you exactly nowhere. some of you might be annoyed with me, to be drawn-in and sent away without knowing. i can understand that. but i want to ask- do you really want to know? are you so keen to categorize these blobs and slabs that you can’t just click away now, content with this meaninglessly miniscule portion of mystery still in tact? i would think that the prospect of being shown a group of images, complete with texture and shape and color, which make absolutely no claim on being “art” of any kind whatsoever, and in fact emphatically deny being any such thing, would be a welcome respite. a sort of reward in itself. these are images after all which require no kind of adoration or supplication from you. their existence does not imply, in any way, that you must give them proper consideration or else find yourself judged. they do not take titles or feel entitled to your attention. they do not seek the high ground of a pedistal. they do not claim to be meaningful. they do not pretend to be removed from you, the viewer, but simultaneously crave your praise. you would not want to own them and they are not worth your money. they’re not art. isn’t that enough? if it isn’t enough for you, well, i’m happy to point you toward the answers you seek. but remember- once you know what these things-that-are-not-art are… you can’t “unknow” that knowledge. and you might want to. i mean things that aren’t art usually have meanings and real consequence which aren’t always pleasant. outside of the realm of art, your safety can not be 100% guaranteed. if your adamant though- here you go . until next time. hide full text 08.17. filed under: misc. 6 wit larded with malice or: the satirical russian magazines of 1905-08 in russia, following a string of embarrassing defeats in the russo-japanese war and the infamous bloody sunday incident, during the period of the so called failed revolution , no less than 480 underground magazines sprung-up to voice the outrage of the many disparate groups and factions and movements—nihilists, anarchists, socialists, mensheviks, bolsheviks, etc—which though unorganized, were united in their calls for tsarist reform. this outpouring of printed materials, critical of the state, was no small thing in a country with a long history of strict censorship and brutal punishments for dissension. these many short-lived publications are referred to, collectively, as “satires.” view full text today, when we (soft, fattened, fiddling nero’s in miniature that we are) think “satire” we reflexively brace ourselves for the haw-haws. we think of colbert and the onion, or if we’re a bit older maybe weird al and doonesbury, or mad magazine and dr. strangelove. if we’re real oldenhiemers, with half a mind left, we might conjure fond memories of the great dictator and h.l. mencken and a childhood of twain stories and thomas nast reprints. in any case, for us, “satire” may as well be a straight-up 1-to-1 synonym for “funny.” these russian satires? not so much. from, leshili (woodgoblin) no.2, 1906. granted, i can’t read cyrillic, and the million little contextual and cultural cues on display are obviously totally beyond me; i’m literally just looking at pictures. but one gets the sense looking over these underground turn-of the-century publications that the “satire” was here accompanied by an entirely different sort of wink. the closest equivalent i can think of, which might resonate for those living in a free and democratic society, would be the evocation of “satire” as a defense in an ugly slander lawsuit… if slander were punishable by death. not much “comedy” involved. in these russian magazines “satire” would seem, more than anything, a thin but precious barrier against open reprisal. it’s said that these satires helped drive public opinion, to bring the criticisms which simmered just below the surface out into the open, and to force the first small concessions from the autocratic tsar nicolas ii. whether they in fact shamed the powers-that-be… it’s doubtful. i can say with certainty, however, that the graphic work in these publications, produced as they were under constant threat, does put most “underground” magazine work produced since to shame. the images, bleak and violent, mournful and angry though they are, remain powerful and terrifically beautiful. below, as illustration, i’ve reproduced a

URL analysis for thenonist.com

http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3733
http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3726
http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3764
http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3740
http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3754
http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3780
http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3758
http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3711
http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3775
http://www.thenonist.com/#ext3774
calabria.org.uk
cocaine.org.uk
gdl.cdlr.strath.ac.uk
mshepley.btinternet.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: THENONIST.COM
Registry Domain ID: 95986595_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucowsdomains.com
Updated Date: 2017-09-27T19:00:22Z
Creation Date: 2003-03-20T17:34:24Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-03-20T16:34:24Z
Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: DNS1601-1.NEXCESS.NET
Name Server: DNS1601-2.NEXCESS.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-07-28T23:27:47Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Tucows Domains Inc.

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =thenonist.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME thenonist.com

  CHANGED 2017-09-27

  CREATED 2003-03-20

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  DNS1601-1.NEXCESS.NET 209.126.17.85

  DNS1601-2.NEXCESS.NET 209.126.16.103

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .